临时天堂
不舍Newshub关闭,AM Show知名主持人泪洒直播间_我的网站

A |

Tian Xuan Photo: Courtesy of Tian
In economic theory, "overcapacity" - for which no universally accepted definition exists - is inherently a recurring feature of the market economy's dynamic "balance - imbalance - rebalance" cycle. The Western narrative that equates China's sizable production capacity directly with "overcapacity" defies economic logic and rigor; in reality, it represents a politicization of trade and economic issues.
First, it confuses the concepts of "capacity scale" and "overcapacity." China's overall industrial capacity utilization remains within a reasonable range. Periodically lower utilization in traditional sectors reflects a normal adjustment as these industries advance toward high-end, intelligent, and green production. Ample capacity in certain emerging industries is precisely what meets surging global demand for high-end, smart, and green solutions. Therefore, equating scale with excess is typical equivocation.
Second, "overcapacity" itself is a dynamic feature of market economies, where no fixed balance persists indefinitely. Judging capacity based solely on static snapshots violates basic economic principles.
Third, it is erroneous to simplistically link trade surpluses or industrial subsidies to overcapacity, while ignoring the macro context of global specialization and cross-border savings-investment structures. It also disregards the reality that reasonable capacity utilization ranges differ across economies at varying stages of development. Imposing a single standard on China is neither scientific nor rigorous.
China's global competitiveness in green technology stems from sustained, large-scale investment in innovation, a comprehensive industrial and supply chain system, massive application scenarios, and intense market competition - not from alleged government subsidies. After decades of long-cycle R&D, Chinese industries have achieved breakthroughs in core technologies such as power batteries and photovoltaic modules.
During the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021-25), China's nationwide R&D spending grew at an average annual rate of 10 percent. Economies of scale have continuously diluted production costs. China's ultra-large domestic market and full-chain supporting ecosystem provide an optimal testing ground for new technologies - from pilot verification to mass deployment. With more than 200 million market entities driving fierce competition, enterprises are constantly compelled to cut costs, raise efficiency, and upgrade products, thereby forging dual advantages in price and performance that we see today.
There is no direct causation between subsidies and overcapacity. Industrial subsidies are a globally recognized practice, typically aimed at correcting market failures and advancing critical technologies. China's subsidies are granted on an impartial basis to all types of market entities, in full compliance with WTO rules, and have not triggered disorderly capacity expansion.
Currently, capacity utilization in China's green industries remains within a reasonable range. Support is primarily directed toward R&D, technological breakthroughs, and consumer-side incentives through market-based mechanisms - not toward fueling overcapacity. Crucially, China's high-quality capacity has reduced the global cost of green transition, representing an opportunity rather than a shock to world development.
Against the backdrop of global carbon neutrality goals, labeling China's new energy capacity as "overcapacity" is entirely untenable. According to the International Energy Agency, global data center electricity consumption will approach 1 trillion kWh by 2030, with 40 percent of incremental power needing to come from renewables. Demand for wind power, photovoltaics, power batteries, and related green energy solutions remains far from saturated - so claims of "overcapacity" are groundless.
China's capacity plays a central role in advancing the global energy transition. Over the past decade, the levelized cost of electricity from wind and solar globally has fallen by more than 60 percent and 80 percent respectively - improvements largely attributable to Chinese innovation and manufacturing, which have directly lowered the cost threshold for worldwide green transformation.
The US journal Science crowned the global renewable energy surge led by China among its Top 10 Breakthroughs of 2025. Leveraging its technological and scale advantages, China is well positioned to supply abundant, high-quality green energy equipment and solutions, meet fast-growing renewable demand from data centers, industrial production, and other sectors, and tangibly support countries in implementing the Paris Agreement. In short, China is a pivotal force driving the global low-carbon transition.
The so-called "China Shock 2.0" is fundamentally a protectionist narrative rooted in Cold War thinking - a politically motivated claim inconsistent with facts. The rapid development of China's modern industries is driven by innovation and sustained institutional reform, not by dumping allegedly excess capacity abroad. Rather than posing a shock, China's industrial progress offers a "China Opportunity 2.0." It delivers multiple dividends to global development - innovation dividends, market dividends, and growth dividends - while injecting stability and vitality into global industrial chains through an open and win-win approach.
China's high-quality green and high-tech exports have tangibly accelerated the global green transition and reduced production costs worldwide. Meanwhile, as the world's largest goods consumption market and the second-largest importer for 17 consecutive years, China provides enormous market opportunities for economies around the globe. Moreover, China's open-source collaboration and technology sharing in frontier fields such as artificial intelligence and the digital economy enable developing countries to bridge the digital divide at lower cost and share in the benefits of the technological revolution.
The facts demonstrate that China's emerging technologies and products represent a "China Opportunity 2.0" - driving global technological progress, accelerating the green transition, improving livelihoods across nations, and bolstering the industrialization of developing economies. This open and mutually beneficial cooperation stands as the true engine of global economic recovery and sustainable development.
This article is compiled based on an interview with Tian Xuan, dean at the Guanghua School of Management and Boya Distinguished Professor of Finance of Peking University. [email protected]
。

B | Nancy 编译 根据英文《先驱报》的报道,新西兰主要新闻媒体Newshub宣布将于6月30日关闭新闻编辑室,同时关闭Newshub网站。这一消息在昨日宣布后,在今早的AM Show节目中引发了一场感人至深的瞬间。
新西兰知名主持人Lloyd Burr和Melissa Chan-Green在直播中,满含泪水地感谢观众在Newshub宣布关闭消息后的支持,并讨论了关闭新闻编辑室的计划。
Advertise with us
Burr紧握着Chan-Green的手哽咽地说道:“我无法表达今天早上有你们陪伴是多么美妙。你们可能已经看到了昨天我们公司宣布关闭Newshub的消息。

C | ”
“有人问我们,这是否也会影响到AM?AM和Newshub是一家的,我们都是同一个大家庭的一部分,我希望你们能听到我的声音,所以是的:这确实也意味着AM即将关闭。”
Burr表示,对于Newshub的每个人来说,在过去的24小时都是“巨大的悲伤”。
“这是非常艰难的,但我们会度过难关,你将与我们一起度过难关,你将帮助我们度过难关。” Burr反复强调说。

D |
主持人Chan-Green提到她有幸能在Newshub和TV3工作了17年。
“这段时间让我度过了一些非常难忘的时期,我很幸运能与你们所有人一起工作,包括昨天在听到此消息后留下来的新闻编辑室的人。”
“他们留在新闻编辑室,发布了昨天的通告,并在今天早上准备了节目,因为我们关心我们所做的事情,也关心你所观看的内容,非常感谢有大家的陪伴,也谢谢你们的支持。” Chan-Gree再次说到。

E |
Burr最后表示,当面临困难时,团队会“渡过难关”。
“我不敢相信昨晚他们能继续专业地工作,而我们出色的工作团队今天也成功地为我们制作了这一场精彩的节目。”
Newshub晚间6点(Newshub Live at 6pm )著名主持人Mike McRoberts昨天告诉媒体,这一消息“令人心碎”。
在今早的AM Show节目中,我们看到了每个人对Newshub的不舍之情,主持人们深情地表达了对Newshub关闭的感受以及对支持者的感激。这一决定不仅影响到Newshub团队,也将对新西兰的新闻报道产生深远影响。对于新闻行业来说,这是一个巨大的挑战,但也是一个团结和坚韧的时刻。
相关阅读:
悲伤的一天!Newshub宣布关闭,政界人士纷纷做出回应
新西兰主流新闻网站将关闭,员工自己都不知道这新闻
NZME发布“分裂”年报:利润腰斩但数字业务喜人
注:本文为编译/原创,欢迎转发分享;但严禁复制等未经授权的非法使用。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其相关法律责任。使用授权请联系[email protected]。
chineseherald.co.nz All Rights Reserved 版权所有
(责编:Nancy)
相关内容
枪支法又要修订,联合政府打算怎么改?
悲伤的一天!Newshub宣布关闭,政界人士纷纷做出回应
1月份新西兰35人死于交通事故,这一行为成罪魁祸首!
新西兰主流新闻网站将关闭,员工自己都不知道这新闻
新西兰人气最高前总理宣布退休,下一站是夏威夷
奥克兰高档电动自行车连环窃案告破,警方还搜出200发子弹
国会紧急立法:撤销毛利卫生局、废除最严禁烟令
又发现一起!前绿党议员被指控第四项入店行窃罪!。
Current article:http://9omwm.cesangrangshunzashuangruijiu.pics/uuyw9/20260826/26121.html
Published on:21:41:20